Assessing the Capabilities of ChatGPT as a Job Candidate

Recently, our company’s hiring team conducted an experiment that explored the capabilities of AI as a job candidate. Instead of replacing human evaluators with AI, we replaced the candidate applying for the job with ChatGPT, a sophisticated AI language model trained by OpenAI, in the pre-screening hiring test. The goal of the experiment was to assess ChatGPT's capabilities as a job candidate and compare it to that of humans.

What makes this experiment particularly interesting is that Róbert Csákány, the test evaluator was unaware that an AI model took the test. Upon evaluating the results, he was surprised by the thorough work done. Despite the fact that the answers were not always completely clear and mistakes were made, he was impressed by the depth of the answers provided and got the feeling that the "candidate" was genuinely interested in the job. He also noted that the AI was more competent than some of the real applicants. 

ChatGPT may sometimes exceed expectations with its responses thanks to its training on a large and diverse corpus of text data from the internet. This allows it to learn and understand a wide range of language patterns, nuances, and contexts that it can draw upon to generate responses that are relevant and accurate. ChatGPT uses advanced algorithms and models such as transformer-based neural networks that enable it to learn complex relationships between words and phrases and to generate responses that are contextually appropriate. It also has the ability to continuously learn and improve. As it interacts with more users and receives feedback on its responses, it can adjust its algorithms and models to improve the accuracy and relevance of its answers. While it is a machine learning model, it can be quite “creative”, and sometimes comes up with responses that are beyond what is expected. 

Although based on the test results alone, Rob thought that the test was real, and wanted to invite the test taker for an interview, it didn't come as much of a surprise to him when it turned out that it was ChatGPT that completed the test as the filling method was strange somehow. While it has been trained on a vast corpus of text from the internet, there may be gaps in its knowledge or biases in the data that affect the responses even in quite surprising ways. Another reason could be that as an AI language model, ChatGPT doesn't have feelings, emotions, or a human sense of logic or context.

This experiment underscores the impressive capabilities of AI language models, particularly their ability to provide responses that are almost indistinguishable from those of human candidates. This achievement can be attributed to the significant advances in AI technology, which have enabled AI models to comprehend complex tasks with remarkable accuracy and precision. However, it is crucial to recognize the limitations of AI models in evaluating soft skills, such as emotional intelligence and communication skills, which are essential in many jobs.

BlackBelt .
Written by

BlackBelt .



Assessing the Capabilities of ChatGPT as a Job Candidate

2 min


Artificial Intelligence


professional interview




Other blog posts

Contact us

+36 1 611 0462